yannick

ยท 204 words ยท 1 minute read

Comments ๐Ÿ”—

  • Abstract: comment on the argument (why would it impact risk management), and after describing your results, comment on the implications

    • Gives evidence for the view that risk preferences are fixed, or at least, not so easy to change
  • Good job in the introduction. You can be a little bit more extensive when describing your results, and, as in the abstract, reflect on the implications

  • The literature review also looks nice and very structured

  • Tables look very nice now

    • Table 9: like table 8, this kind of supports a change in risk preferences, so maybe it is too one-sided to say that there is absolutely no support for changes in preferences
    • Table 10: Change income should maybe be log-transformed?
      • Similarly in some tables, there are still small coefficients
    • Interpretation: Covid intensity does not influence the change in risk preferences
      • Pitfalls: regional treatment assignment - not necessarily realistic
    • Think about the interpretation of results like in table 8, 9
  • Conclusion:

We have found that risk preferences were not altered by Covid-19 for most individuals in the Netherlands, and for those whose risk preferences were altered, the change was random

  • What do you mean with this line?
    • You have a couple of sentences like this
.616-1.427-8.186-1.427-13.704 c0-16.562,5.853-30.692,17.56-42.399c11.703-11.706,25.837-17.561,42.394-17.561c17.515,0,32.079,6.283,43.688,18.846 c13.134-2.474,25.892-7.33,38.26-14.56c-4.757,14.652-13.613,25.788-26.55,33.402c12.368-1.716,23.88-4.95,34.537-9.708 C357.458,149.793,347.462,160.166,335.471,168.735z"/>
Powered by Hugo Theme By nodejh