Influence of CEO Pol. Ideology on Corporate Governance ๐
-
I like the subject a lot, very clear, simple, but interesting question
-
Two dependent variables:
- Corporate Scandals
- Corporate Governance Performance
-
1st remark: “performance” is still a blurry concept, maybe good to use a less abstract term in the abstract
-
No need to explain data collection, sample in the abstract. (After you have the results, you can provide a short summary)
-
Better focus on a short (theoretical) argument why CEOs pol. ideology influences scandals (what is a scandal, how does it differ materially from ordinary corp. governance policy)
Introduction ๐
-
Friedman not necessarily “introduces” agency theory
-
Provides a (normative) perspective on what business should do
-
Formal treatment of agency theory can be found in Grossman and Heart (1992)
-
Your treatment about how and why scandals can happen should follow from this perspective (imo), not necessarily from difference in normative visions of business
-
The empirical literature you cite is good and appropriate
-
You have a nice build-up about why CEO characteristics in general can influence firm policy (“A CEO has discretion due to imperfect monitoring”)
-
But, the introduction of your hypothesis is very ad hoc - why exactly political ideology
-
Give a nice example or cite literature
-
Also, address the principal methodological challenges to identifying an effect (firms who might be more prone to scandals might be more prone to hire CEO’s with a certain political ideology) - and what you do to take that into account
Lit. Rev ๐
-
I would like to see section 2.1 expand more about principal-agent theory of firms
-
Section 2.2 introduces the various aspects of corp. governance you are about to test
-
2.3 is a little bit ad hoc, what is the point of writing about ratings? Do you use it? Then, it should be in methodology
-
In 2.5, are there also theoretical frameworks that incorporate CEO ideology, as opposed to empirical research?
Methodology ๐
- Why pooled OLS analyses? Maybe it could be useful to exploit only within-firm observations / Fixed-effects model
- This can also tackle some of the endogeneity issues you describe